Tuesday, February 24, 2009

FTC's Green Guides need update sooner than later

FTC's Green Guides need update sooner than later
John Kalkowski, Editorial Director - Packaging Digest

Recent articles show that “natural” and “environmentally friendly” messages resonate with consumers, as thousands of new products introduced in 2008 rely on those attributes in both product and packaging marketing to help boost sales.

With the proliferation of this message, many marketers skate dangerously close to what might be considered misleading or even false advertising. One study done by TerraChoice Environmental Marketing finds that 99 percent of 1,018 “green” advertising claims for everyday consumer products could be misleading.

The industry needs an up-to-date set of guidelines on what are acceptable marketing practices, taking into account new packaging materials, new technology and the changing perceptions of today's consumers. The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which is charged with protecting the American public from misleading environmental marketing messages has established its interpretation as to what are deceptive environmental marketing claims in a document known as the Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims or “Green Guides.”

The Guides originally were published in 1992 and were updated in 1998. To its credit, the FTC launched a new review in 2007 and held three workshops in 2008 to solicit public input on what should be included in a revised set of guidelines. However, new Green Guides have not been issued. At this point, the FTC says it wants any new guidelines to be “done right,” but the agency does not have a target date for release. The commission's staff must prepare recommendations to the five commissioners who make the ultimate decision. When the new guidelines are written, they likely will be subject to a final round of public comment before a final decision is made. The new federal administration also may want to put its own stamp on the direction any changes might take.

A sustainability study done late in 2008 by Packaging Digest and the Sustainable Packaging Coalition, shows that 77 percent of the respondents feel minimum standards should be set before packagers can market themselves as “green.” When asked who should set the standards for sustainability claims, 42 percent said they believe the federal government should do so, followed closely by either a third-party program or trade associations.

It appears the industry wants stringent guidelines that remove ambiguities. This is important because local and state jurisdictions increasingly rely on the Green Guides for direction on enforcement, even though the FTC does not pre-empt regulation of environmental claims by individual states.

For more information, click here.

-- CardPak Inc.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Case Study: Paul Mitchell - sustainable & elegant

A great case study involving Paul Mitchell Systems and JohnsByrne (Graphic Technologies) in regards to meeting a client's needs and desires from an sustainable aspect, as well as providing the 'look' that is demanded, expected, and customary in the marketplace.

Click on photo below to enlarge and read the case study...
-- CardPak Inc.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

New CardPak website

After a period of redesign, the new www.CardPak.com is now live!

There are still more additions & features coming soon to the website, so visit frequently, but this is a great upgrade and reflects the corporate direction and sustainable focus that CardPak continues to integrate.

-- CardPak Inc.

Friday, February 13, 2009

Smart Business Cleveland - Sustainable Manufacturing

CardPak president, Tony Petrelli, was featured for the cover story, 'Sustainable Manufacturing', in this months Smart Business Cleveland...

A care package for the future
How Tony Petrelli keeps CardPak Inc. focused on practicing sustainability
Smart Business Cleveland | February 2009

Tony Petrelli is proud of the awards that CardPak Inc. has received for producing packaging that is both durable and environmentally friendly. But it’s not accolades that Petrelli seeks through the company’s commitment to sustainability.

Rather, Petrelli hopes employees, clients and any other stakeholders who come into contact with CardPak see the company’s passion for doing what it feels is right and applies that to its actions.

CardPak has developed numerous sustainable packaging concepts that address the concerns of major retailers regarding source and material reductions as well as recyclability requirements.

The company’s EcoLogical Line of Packaging has been created to remove significant amounts of packaging materials from the waste stream and use 100 percent recycled materials when possible.

Petrelli believes it is his responsibility, as well as that of his employees, to carry on the company’s history of finding the safest and most efficient way possible to manufacture its products.

CardPak is able to create products that reduce the amount of total materials used while providing consumers with a better package for protecting and dispensing the products they buy.

It’s not just the products that CardPak manufactures, however, that reflect the company’s commitment to sustainability. By using more efficient lighting in the company’s plant, energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions were trimmed by more than half, saving a potential 600 barrels of oil per year.

The company also has adopted a lean manufacturing strategy that reduces in-plant manufacturing waste by more than 2 percent per month, reducing the amount of paperboard waste going to the landfill or having to be collected for recycling by close to 350 tons annually.

At the same time, the company is able to collect and provide more than 2,700 tons of fiber waste per year for use in the manufacturing of recycled paperboard for future packaging products.

So when the company was honored at the Environmental Printing Awards in Toronto last February, CardPak employees were gratified at the recognition. But the awards do not so much represent a goal achieved as much as a reinforcement of the company’s commitment to the future stake-holders of a community we are all a part of: the Earth.

-- CardPak Inc.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

Field Guide to Sustainable Packaging

"The Field Guide to Sustainable Packaging is a meaningful and motivating source of information that is filled with real-life examples and success stories. A 'must read' for both veterans and newcomers to the packaging development process." --Brad Menees, Vice President--Technology and Development R&D, Campbell Soup Company

"One of the greatest challenges facing companies looking to advance the sustainability of their packages is the absence of guidance and inspiration. Stev
e Sterling's Field Guide offers a practical resource for better understanding the fundamentals of sustainable packaging and learning from the experiences of others. Whether you're starting out or you're a seasoned veteran on the journey to sustainability, this book is a valuable read." --Scott Vitters, Director Sustainable Packaging, The Coca Cola Company

"Sustainability is a dynamic force in the packaging world--it cannot be ignored. As a catalyst for change, sustainable packaging will serve as a ne
w and exciting source of innovation for all of the constituents in the packaging value chain for years to come. Sterling's Field Guide to Sustainable Packaging serves as an excellent information source for both the novice and the experienced practitioner." --Jay L. Gouliard, Vice President--Global Packaging, Unilever

From the publishers of Packaging World - Field Guide to Sustainable Packaging:

Now in its second printing, this acclaimed resource explores the origins and definition of sustainability and offers actionable strategies, inspirational success stories and essential resources for your company to begin or continue your journey towards sustainability. Inside this 70-page volume you’ll find:

* interviews with high-level professionals who have successfully realigned their corporate goals to integrate sustainability

* practical case histories offering real world models

* timely insights into the Wal-Mart Scorecard, including an exclusive Packaging World interview with Sam's Club's Director of Packaging

* a wealth of resources to use, as you develop or improve your company’s environmental stewardship strategy.


-- CardPak Inc.

Monday, February 9, 2009

Consumers Still Buying Green...

Consumers Still Buying Green Despite Economic Downturn, Says Study
Research shows that 82 percent of shoppers continue to seek eco-friendly products


Four out of five people say they are still buying green products and services today—which sometimes cost more—even in the midst of a U.S. recession.

A new study commissioned by Green Seal and EnviroMedia Social Marketing and conducted by Opinion Research Corporation reveals peoples’ opinions and behaviors about products that claim to be environmentally friendly.

Half of the 1,000 people surveyed say they are buying just as many green products now as before the economic downturn, while 19 percent say they are buying more green products. Fourteen percent say they are buying fewer environmentally green products.

Other key findings in the new research conducted by telephone in a random-digit-dial sample:

Brand Reputation Matters More Than Ads
Twenty-one percent (21%) of consumers say a product’s reputation is the biggest factor they weigh when making purchasing decisions followed by word of mouth (19%) and brand loyalty (15%). Just 9 percent say green advertising is their primary influencer.
More “Green Claims” Education Needed

About one in three say they don’t know how to tell if green claims are true.

One in 10 consumers blindly trusts green product claims.

Consumers are verifying green claims by reading the packaging (24%) and turning to research (going online, reading studies; 17%).

What Consumers Say Versus Do
While 87 percent of people surveyed say they recycle, the Environmental Protection Agency reports just 33 percent of our waste is diverted from landfills.

The other things people do are look for minimally packaged goods (60%) which is statistically tied with buying green cleaning products (58%). Buying green personal-care products came in at 31%.

"This research suggests that consumers are buying green products second only to participating in recycling,” said Arthur Weissman, Ph.D., Green Seal's President and CEO. "This increased consumer demand sends a signal to manufacturers to produce products that are truly green.”

Green Seal, an independent nonprofit product certification organization, and EnviroMedia Social Marketing are releasing the research today from the first-ever Greenwashing Forum in Portland. The forum, hosted by the University of Oregon, was inspired by the Greenwashing Indexsm (www.Greenwashingindex.com), which was launched in January 2008 by EnviroMedia and the UO School of Journalism and Communication. Since the popular watchdog Web site was founded, consumers in 138 countries have been posting and rating ads to “out” greenwashers and showcase companies that employ sound environmental marketing efforts.

“There’s a real opportunity for authentic green marketing, despite the tough economy,” said Valerie Davis, EnviroMedia Principal and CEO. “This research proves people want to do what’s best for the environment, but it needs to be easy and accessible. Companies should be clear about the environmental benefits of their products and services and make sure what they claim in the TV ad is backed up consistently on product packaging and on the Web site.”

Sources: Green Seal; EnviroMedia Social Marketing

-- CardPak Inc.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

What’s the Score?

What's the Score?
As they say, you can't tell the players without a scorecard!
By Tom Polischuk (PackagePrinting.com)

Wal-Mart has clout—there’s no doubt about that. When Wal-Mart speaks, people listen—especially its suppliers.

The company created a real buzz for RFID a few years ago, when it announced that it was mandating the use of this technology from its suppliers. Although this effort has faded from the limelight and has been largely redefined in scope, RFID technology received more attention during a two-year period than it would have gotten in a decade. RFID technology still has a ways to go in terms of reliability and cost, but Wal-Mart’s initiative probably did a lot to advance its development.

Before the dust had a chance to settle on its RFID efforts, Wal-Mart took on another noteworthy initiative—sustainability. In September 2006, the company announced that it would institute using a Packaging Scorecard with its suppliers to help the company meet its commitment to reduce the use of packaging materials across its global supply chain by 5 percent by 2013.

The Scorecard, unveiled at Pack Expo 2006, is based on metrics for how packaging impacts sustainability factors throughout many aspects of the entire supply chain. They were developed over many months by the Packaging Sustainable Value Network, a group of 200 suppliers, experts, and other Wal-Mart stakeholders. These metrics and their Scorecard weighting factors are: greenhouse gases/CO2 per ton of production (15 percent); material value (15); product/package ratio (15); cube utilization (a measure of storage efficiency in warehousing and shipping trailors/containers, 15 percent); transportation (10); recycled content (10); recovery value (10); renewable -energy (5); and innovation (5).

The Scorecard has been in various stages of use and implementation since its introduction. Even before it officially went online in February 2008, Wal-Mart reported that more than 97,000 products had been entered into the Scorecard by more than 6,300 vendors.

Diamond Packaging and CardPak are just two package printers that have been actively involved with the Scorecard and have been experiencing its impact firsthand.

Diamond Packaging has been proactive on the sustainability front for a number of years now, having committed to the use of renewable wind energy, and started a program called the greenbox initiative to develop and implement sustainable packaging solutions for its customers.

Dennis Bacchetta is director of marketing for -Diamond Packaging. Although he believes that sustainability has gained a great deal of traction from “a confluence of legislative, corporate, and consumer interest,” he also says that the Wal-Mart Scorecard has done its part in raising the stakes.

“Wal-Mart’s Packaging Scorecard tool has helped put the concept of sustainable packaging in the forefront of many companies’ and consumers’ minds, and thus been a key driver in trying to understand what sustainability truly is,” he says. “As a result, many consumer product companies [CPCs] have requested information on sustainability, including our efforts to design more eco-friendly packaging, and our experience with the Wal-Mart Packaging Scorecard tool. We anticipate that as sustainability continues to grow in the public and corporate awareness, it will become ingrained in our corporate and social structure.”

David Himmelein, regional sales and marketing manager for CardPak, also recognizes the impact that the Scorecard has made and the opportunities that it presents to his company and others. “The Packaging Scorecard is one of the first tools of its kind to judge the entire package that hits the Wal-Mart shelves,” he notes. “This has been beneficial to CardPak because our EcoLogical Line of Packaging eliminates the harmful PVC plastic clamshells from the waste stream. The scorecard now gives us an opportunity to measure the differences in the original packaging and our solution.”

The ability to provide a tangible measurement system lies at the heart of the Scorecard’s value to its users. When something can be measured, it can be improved. “The value we get from the Wal-Mart Packaging Scorecard is that it provides measurable evidence that our designs have increased a package’s sustainability,” says Bacchetta.

CardPak uses the Scorecard as an additional sales tool in its arsenal, and performs mock-Scorecard analyses to show the impact that its packaging system has when compared to traditional clamshell alternatives. “This information is then presented to our customers for them to use in making their decisions on the engineering of each product package. They are well aware of Wal-Mart’s objectives for the Scorecard, so will want to have the best possible score for each package,” notes Himmelein.

It is not surprising that Himmelein reports all of CardPak’s customers that sell to Wal-Mart are involved with the Scorecard in some form. To provide a value-added service to its customers, CardPak hosted an exclusive training event early in 2007 with ECRM and Mars Packaging that allowed its customers to get answers to their questions concerning the Scorecard.

Bacchetta notes that even companies that do not directly supply Wal-Mart have been impacted by the Scorecard due to increased sustainability awareness. “They see it as an opportunity to support a sustainable use of resources and cultivate a positive emotional connection to their brand,” he says.

Diamond Packaging has used the Scorecard for many customer projects. One in particular—done for a well-known personal care company, says Bacchetta—rated various products and developed a plan for redesigning their packaging based on weight, environmental impact, and material. “We then scored the new packaging to ensure that, when compared to the existing packaging, it resulted in a score improvement,” he explains.

CardPak successfully implemented a redesign for the packaging of GE’s compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs) that are carried in Sam’s Club stores, says Himmelein. “The original package was in a PVC clamshell, and scored a 3.5. By switching to the ClubPak™ style, we were able to more than double the scorecard value to a 7.5.”

Of the Scorecard’s nine metrics, both Himmelein and Bacchetta agree that a package printer can have the greatest impact on the product/package ratio.

In CardPak’s case, the traditional PVC clamshell is a prime target. “Oftentimes, the overall weight and size of the clamshell is too much,” says Himmelein. “We have reduced the footprint of the package and removed up to 85 percent of the plastic materials, resulting in a better score for this particular metric.”

According to Bacchetta, reducing the weight of a package can impact several areas in the Scorecard’s metrics, including conserving raw materials and energy, reducing greenhouse gases, and minimizing discards. “This can be achieved through careful material selection, reduced board usage, and the elimination of components (e.g., thermoform and shrink wrap).”

Another area of focus for package printers is cube utilization, says Baccetta. “However, this requires a higher level of collaboration with other partners throughout the supply chain (marketing/sales, distribution, retailer, etc.) in an effort to reduce material and energy usage, and maximize shipping efficiencies.”

Going forward

Since it was first announced in 2006, Wal-Mart’s Packaging Scorecard has made a significant impact throughout the consumer products arena. Last November, Wal-Mart again used Pack Expo as a forum to announce evolutionary changes to the system.

In a keynote presentation, Amy Zettlemoyer-Lazar, packaging director, Sam’s Club and co-manager of Wal-Mart’s Sustainability Value Network, reported that the Scorecard’s metrics would be adjusted to increase the focus on greenhouse gas and packaging weight reductions. She also said that in 2009, Scorecard implementation would begin to move beyond the U.S. and include other countries such as Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, and China.

For many North American package printers, the Scorecard’s impact has already been felt. Himmelein attributes some of CardPak’s success with its EcoLogical Line to the Wal-Mart Scorecard. “Wal-Mart is the driving force in sustainable package leadership,” he says. “Our customers know this and we, in turn, want to be able to meet our customers’ needs. This is a growth opportunity for us as a company. Two years ago the EcoLogical Line of packaging did not exist at CardPak, and today it is almost 50 percent of our total product mix.”

“The Scorecard has had a positive impact on how we approach our business and our customers,” adds Bacchetta.

With the focus that the Scorecard is receiving from the packaging arena, it appears that Wal-Mart is well on its way to achieving its 2013 goal of a 5 percent reduction in packaging throughout its supply chain.

-- CardPak Inc.

Tuesday, February 3, 2009

Clamshells Made With Ingeo Prove Sustainable

PackExpo.com / Business Wire (Press Release) - A first-of-its-kind lifecycle analysis finds that clamshell packaging made from Ingeo, a unique biopolymer derived from plants rather than oil, emits fewer greenhouse gases and uses less energy when compared to clamshells manufactured with petroleum-based rPET (recycled polyethylene terephthalate).

The Institute for Energy and Environmental Research (IFEU), Heidelberg, Germany, conducted the head-to-head lifecycle comparison on more than 40 different combinations of clamshell packaging made from Ingeo natural plastic, PET, and rPET. Both Ingeo and rPET clamshells outperformed PET packaging in terms of lower overall greenhouse gas emissions and lower overall energy consumed. Ingeo clamshells clearly offered further advantages over the petroleum-based rPET in numerous comparisons.

"Brand owners and converters will lower the carbon and energy footprint of clamshell packaging by moving away from PET and rPET to Ingeo polymer," said Marc Verbruggen, president and CEO of NatureWorks, the manufacturer of Ingeo. "This is true with today's virgin Ingeo and, in the longer term, recycled Ingeo will decrease that footprint even more. Furthermore, the high performance of Ingeo biopolymer in clamshell applications means that less material may be required to manufacture them " on average 25 percent less."

Representative results of the lifecycle analysis:

The study showed that clamshell packaging consisting of 100 percent rPET emitted 58.6 kilograms of CO2 equivalents per 1,000 clamshells. Ingeo 2005, a representative grade biopolymer in the study, emitted 49.2 kilograms " an overall 16 percent reduction in CO2 equivalents. The Ingeo clamshell was lighter, yet functionally equivalent in terms of top-load strength.

Energy consumed over the lifecycle for 100 percent rPET clamshells was 1.1 gigajoules. This compared to .93 gigajoules for the lighter, yet functionally equivalent, Ingeo 2005 packaging " an overall 15 percent reduction in energy consumed.

"The study found that Ingeo compares favorably with rPET even when a producer chooses not to lightweight a clamshell," said Steve Davies, NatureWorks director of Communications and Public Affairs. "The study also showed that the next generation of Ingeo biopolymer, which will be available in 2009, offers further improvements in eco-profile and clearly outperforms 100 percent rPET in head-to-head comparisons."

Clear plastic clamshells, like the ones analyzed in the study, are often used for fresh produce and foodservice packaging " for example, lettuce, tomatoes, sandwiches, or deli salads. Currently this packaging is not recycled in either the U.S. or Europe. In the U.S. clamshell packaging typically goes to landfills after use, while in Europe this packaging may be incinerated for waste-heat recovery. The lifecycle study took both end-of-life scenarios into account.

For a copy of the full IFEU lifecycle analysis comparing rPET and Ingeo natural plastic clamshells, click here. Brand owners and converters in Europe, the Americas, and Asia who are looking for greater sustainability and performance in bottles, clamshells, labels, and other packaging should visit NatureWorks website to locate the nearest sales office.

-- CardPak

Monday, February 2, 2009

LEED or follow...

This is from this past April, but I thought it was another relevant example of how creative projects can get when an environmental angle is factored into the equation. Lo and behold, sometimes that 'green' aspect takes over and steals the show.

The Santa Monica Civic Center parking garage is the first LEED certified parking garage in the US. The garage provides 900 parking spaces throughout six above ground levels and 1 ½ below ground levels.

Of the 900 spaces, 2% are reserved for electric/hybrid vehicles, and come equipped with public electrical outlets. There is also free bicycle storage available to “encourage alternate transportation modes.”


The structure features roof top solar panels, a storm drain water treatment system, recycled construction materials, and energy efficient mechanical systems.

For more details & photos - click here.

-- CardPak Inc.